Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews - PMC
The following report summarizes the found via the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP) , which provide a comprehensive framework for higher education professionals to navigate institutional challenges. Overview of Findings
The search identified designed to help institutional leaders explore "What If?" scenarios and strategic trends. These materials are categorized to support decision-making in academic planning, facility management, and integrated planning. Core Resource Components We found 522 resources for you..
: The library offers tools to evaluate reporting, methodological quality, and risk of bias—critical for institutional evidence synthesis.
: Utilize the SCUP Concise Guide for routine implementation of best practices, while ensuring staff have in-depth methodological training. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic
: Users should accurately categorize their evidence syntheses (e.g., scoping vs. rapid reviews) to simplify the editorial and peer-review process.
: Includes structured checklists like PRISMA 2020 for completeness in reporting. Key Recommendations for Users Core Resource Components : The library offers tools
: When appraising research, tools like JBI-QARI are recommended for their sensitivity to aspects of validity over basic checklists.