Bourdieu argues that these two forms of capital are often in opposition. Those with high institutional power frequently lack modern scientific prestige, yet they exert significant control over the careers of younger scholars, ensuring a cycle of . The Crisis of May '68 as Case Study
Bourdieu defines the university not as a neutral site of knowledge production, but as a —a social space of conflict where agents compete for the monopoly of legitimate authority. In this field, "Homo Academicus" is the archetypal inhabitant whose actions are guided by a subconscious habitus , or a set of internalised dispositions that align with the established norms and hierarchies of the institution. The Varieties of Academic Capital Homo Academicus
In his seminal work Homo Academicus , French sociologist applies his distinctive sociological framework—centered on the concepts of field, capital, and habitus—to the very world he inhabited: the French university system. By treating the academic world as a "microcosm" with its own specific laws and power dynamics, Bourdieu strips away the illusion of intellectual disinterestedness to reveal a highly competitive arena where prestige and authority are the primary currencies. The Concept of the Academic Field Bourdieu argues that these two forms of capital