126635 Apr 2026

While Delfi had a "notice-and-take-down" system in place, the Estonian courts—and eventually the ECHR—ruled that the portal should have done more. Because Delfi was a professional, commercially run news site, the court argued it should have anticipated and prevented such "manifestly unlawful" speech before it was even reported. Why "126635" Matters Today

Critics argue this creates a "chilling effect," where sites might disable comments entirely to avoid the risk of massive legal liability. The Legacy of Delfi AS 126635

While the ECHR case is the most significant historical reference, "126635" also appears in other specialized contexts: While Delfi had a "notice-and-take-down" system in place,

Which of these topics were you for your blog post? The Legacy of Delfi AS While the ECHR

In the early days of the web, the "safe harbor" principle was the gold standard: platforms were generally not responsible for what their users posted, provided they removed illegal content once notified. But in 2013, a judgment indexed as by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) sent shockwaves through the digital world by challenging that very idea. The Case: Delfi AS v. Estonia